<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Standard Nuclear Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog</link>
	<description>Nuclear Medicine &#124; Radiology &#124; Health Physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 16:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Patient Fluoro Dose Tracking and Follow-up Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/fluoro-dose-tracking-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/fluoro-dose-tracking-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 16:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sintal8</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fluoroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluoro dose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation safety policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) has published guidance on the tracking of dose in fluoroscopy. Both a brief outline and a more descriptive white paper are available. Basically, any patient who experienced fluoro time in excess of &#8230; <a href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/fluoro-dose-tracking-policy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) has published guidance on the tracking of dose in fluoroscopy. Both a <a href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/FluoroDoseTrackBrief.pdf">brief outline</a> and a more <a href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/FluoroDoseTrackWhite.pdf">descriptive white paper</a> are available.</p>
<p>Basically, any patient who experienced fluoro time in excess of one hour should be notified and tracked for post-procedure erythema.  Facilities should follow up by telephone approximately 3 weeks after the procedure to ascertain whether there is any evidence of a radiation induced injury. This will assure that prompt medical care will be delivered if necessary.</p>
<p>Other threshold criteria besides simple fluoro time are also discussed.  The linked documentation in the above paragraph should be of great assistance in crafting a facility-specific policy to address this important issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/fluoro-dose-tracking-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radiographic Imaging of Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Women</title>
		<link>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/radiographic-imaging-of-pregnant-or-potentially-pregnant-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/radiographic-imaging-of-pregnant-or-potentially-pregnant-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 04:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sintal8</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pregnant Patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fetal dose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnant patients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The best guidance I have found regarding the imaging of pregnant or potentially pregnant women with x-rays is from this ACR Practice Guideline. From the Guideline: &#8220;If a patient can reliably answer that 1) she cannot be pregnant (for example, &#8230; <a href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/radiographic-imaging-of-pregnant-or-potentially-pregnant-women/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The best guidance I have found regarding the imaging of pregnant or potentially pregnant women with x-rays is from this <a title="ACR PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR IMAGING PREGNANT OR POTENTIALLY PREGNANT ADOLESCENTS AND WOMEN WITH IONIZING RADIATION" href="http://www.who.int/tb/advisory_bodies/impact_measurement_taskforce/meetings/prevalence_survey/imaging_pregnant_arc.pdf">ACR Practice Guideline</a>.</p>
<p>From the Guideline:</p>
<div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium;">&#8220;If a patient can reliably answer that 1) she cannot be pregnant (for example, she is not sexually active, or she is using an effective form of birth control, or she is biologically incapable of conceiving) and that 2) she had a recent complete menstrual period, then it is reasonable to proceed with a medically indicated diagnostic X-ray test of the abdomen or pelvis.&#8221;</span></div>
</div>
<p></p>
<div>Two sample forms are included at the bottom of the ACR guidance.  These forms could be used to draft facility-specific consent forms.  The first could be used to document a negative response to pregnancy, the second for performing procedures on known pregnant women.</div>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/radiographic-imaging-of-pregnant-or-potentially-pregnant-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Radon Levels &#8211; Post Mitigation System Install</title>
		<link>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/update-on-radon-levels-post-mitigation-system-install/</link>
		<comments>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/update-on-radon-levels-post-mitigation-system-install/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sintal8</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radon mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radon testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A month ago I wrote about the installation of a radon mitigation system in my home.  Before the install, the level in the basement measured 12.1 pCi/L , while the level on the first floor measured 6.0 pCi/L. After the &#8230; <a href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/update-on-radon-levels-post-mitigation-system-install/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p><a href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/US_homes_over_recommended_radon_levels.gif"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-374" title="Radon Levels of Homes in the US" src="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/US_homes_over_recommended_radon_levels-300x207.gif" alt="" width="300" height="207" /></a>A month ago I wrote about the <a title="Radon Testing and Mitigation" href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/radon-testing-and-mitigation/">installation of a radon mitigation system</a> in my home.  Before the install, the level in the basement measured 12.1 pCi/L , while the level on the first floor measured 6.0 pCi/L.</p>
<p>After the installation of the active mitigation system, the level on the first floor of the house was reduced to 2.6 pCi/L, as measured with a charcoal detector made by <a href="http://www.radon.com/">Air Chek</a>.  I haven&#8217;t rechecked the basement yet.</p>
<p>In addition to the lower radon reading, I&#8217;ve noticed that the basement humidity averages about 65%, and doesn&#8217;t rise much even after a good rain.  That might make for the most useful result: no more soggy cardboard storage boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/update-on-radon-levels-post-mitigation-system-install/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Study Published on Prolonged Low Dose-Rate Radiation Exposure and Cell Repair</title>
		<link>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/new-study-published-on-prolonged-low-dose-rate-radiation-exposure-and-cell-repair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/new-study-published-on-prolonged-low-dose-rate-radiation-exposure-and-cell-repair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sintal8</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low dose-rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Researchers at MIT recently published a study on the effects of low dose-rate radiation on cell repair mechanisms. One of the more interesting quotes in the story, suggesting that the human body already possesses substantial radiation repair capability: &#8220;DNA damage &#8230; <a href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/new-study-published-on-prolonged-low-dose-rate-radiation-exposure-and-cell-repair/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Researchers at MIT recently <a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/prolonged-radiation-exposure-0515.html">published a study on the effects of low dose-rate radiation on cell repair mechanisms.</a></p>
<p>One of the more interesting quotes in the story, suggesting that the human body already possesses substantial radiation repair capability: &#8220;DNA damage occurs spontaneously even at background radiation levels, conservatively at a rate of about 10,000 changes per cell per day.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/new-study-published-on-prolonged-low-dose-rate-radiation-exposure-and-cell-repair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Addition to Cardiac Stress Test &#8211; Police Interrogation</title>
		<link>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/new-addition-to-cardiac-stress-test-police-interrogation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/new-addition-to-cardiac-stress-test-police-interrogation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 18:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sintal8</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radiation Detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
As part of the Secure the Cities campaign initiated after 9/11, many police departments and state agencies received grants from the federal government to purchase sensitive radiation monitoring devices for use by on-duty police officers, firefighters, and emergency responders.  This &#8230; <a href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/new-addition-to-cardiac-stress-test-police-interrogation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p><a href="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/thermo-radeye.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-364" title="State Trooper with Thermo Scientific RadEye Dosimeter" src="http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/thermo-radeye-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>As part of the Secure the Cities campaign initiated after 9/11, many police departments and state agencies received grants from the federal government to purchase sensitive radiation monitoring devices for use by on-duty police officers, firefighters, and emergency responders.  This<a href="http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&amp;article_id=1648&amp;issue_id=102008"> article in Police Chief Magazine</a> explains the history and intent of the program.  In many cases, police were issued the <a href="http://www.thermoscientific.com/ecomm/servlet/productsdetail?productId=12811385&amp;groupType=PRODUCT&amp;searchType=0&amp;storeId=11152">Thermo Scientific RadEye PRD</a>.</p>
<p>In Connecticut last Wednesday, a <a href="http://www.ctpost.com/default/article/Radioactive-man-Milford-resident-pulled-over-by-3549631.php#photo-2921725">man returning from a nuclear stress test was stopped by a state trooper with a RadEye personal radiation detector</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.standardnuclear.com/blog/new-addition-to-cardiac-stress-test-police-interrogation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.standardnuclear.com @ 2013-06-19 22:46:28 -->